Sunday, November 15, 2015

Seneca River

Introduction: Seneca Lake is about 34.5 miles long. About 3.7 miles wide and has a depth of 630ft. So there could be a lot of different MacroInvertebrates in those 34.5 miles of water. The ecosystem has to be very diverse. There’s many different MacroInvertebrates in Seneca Lake. There’s crayfish, amphipod, stonefly larvae and mayfly larva.
 The temperature of the lake varies. The lake can get as warm as 72 degrees fahrenheit  and it can as cold as 38 degrees fahrenheit. So with that information, can we figure out if the depth at temperature of the water can impact what organisms we’ll find in the water? And does pH and Dissolved Oxygen levels play a role too? I’m very interested to see that part because in the experiments I have done coming up to this one, I’ve really never seen a correlation between pH/dissolved oxygen and what kind of organisms are in that area.  
Research Question:  How is the depth and temperature of the water affect what organisms we’re going to find in the water?
Hypothesis:  I think the deeper/warmer part of the lake will be the most diverse. Since the lake is so deep, I feel like there’s much more room for different MacroInvertebrates. Also, in similar experiments they have found that the population of the lake is much more diverse in the deeper water than the shallow water.
Variable Identification:  
Controlled Variable
Method to control the variable
  • Where we test.
  • How deep the water is.
  • Keep track of the exact latitude and longitude.
  • Measure the depth.


Experimental Setup 12200714_1717710858458944_1714417099_n (2).jpgThis lab was done on Seneca River in Geneva, New York.
Procedure:1.Find three different shallow water locations.
             2. Take the temperature of the 3 different locations.
             3.Find the pH values of all three locations
             4. Take a net and see what kind of MacroInvertebrates you get.
             5. Record your data.
             6. Find three different deep water locations.
             7.Repeat steps 1-5 for the deep water locations.
Data:
Sample 1 a
Sample 1 b
Sample 2 a
Sample 2 b
Sample 3 a
Sample 3 b
Latitude
N 42D 49.940’
N 42D 50.840’
N 42D 51’
N 42D 49.97’
N 42D 51.491’’
N 42D 51.554’’
Longitude
W 76D 57.970’
W 76D 57.522’
W 76D 58’
W 76D 57.94’’
W 76D 57.762’
W 76D 57.562’
Sample temp.
13D Celsius
7D Celsius
13D Celsius
7D Celsius
13D Celsius
13D Celsius
Sample depth
38.9m
10m
10m
54m
Surface
0m
P.H.
7.3
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.5
7.3
Chloride
200 ppm
143 ppm
300 ppm
180 ppm
200 ppm
140 ppm
Dissolved Oxygen
30 ppm
10.4 ppm
6 ppm
10.4 ppm
10 ppm
10 ppm

Sample
Copepod
6
Mussl Larve
1
Bosmia
5
2B

Results :
Evaluation:  I think this was a somewhat solid experiment. But like in any experiment, there’s a certain amount of human error. I think to get a 100% accurate reading you would have to collect more Macroinvertebrate continuously all day. Just to be totally sure.
Conclusion: I think I found a very diverse amount of Macroinvertebrate in Seneca Lake. The largest amount of Macroinvertebrate I found was the Copepod. Then the Bosmia. After the Bosima it’s the Daphia and then it’s a three way tie for last place between the Mussel Larve, Rotifer and Mysis.
References "Lake County Water Atlas." Seneca, Lake: Ecology. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Oct. 2015.
"Does Water Level Affect Benthic Macro-invertebrates of a Marginal Lake in a Tropical River-reservoir Transition Zone?" Does Water Level Affect Benthic Macro-invertebrates of a Marginal Lake in a Tropical River-reservoir Transition Zone? N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Oct. 2015.


"Seneca Lake." - A Guide to Hotels, Bed and Breakfasts in the Finger Lakes. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Oct. 2015.

4 comments:

  1. For some reason not everything transferred over from my google docs the way it should. So don't judge too harshly!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This assignment is incomplete because there is not a graph.

    Defines the problem and selects variables - complete
    Controls variables - complete
    Develops a method for collection of data - partial, the method was what the procedure, and the procedure of what we did on the field trip is missing.

    Data Collection and Processing:
    Recording raw data - Complete
    Processing raw data - incomplete, no graph, also focused on the orignial research question instead of the data we collected.
    Presenting processed data - incomplete, no graph.

    Discussion, Evaluation, and Conclusion:
    Discussing and reviewing - partial, did not talk about the data and results. Did talk about human error in collecting the data.
    Evaluating procedure/suggested improvements - complete. Talks about collecting more macro-invertebrates.
    Concluding -

    Comments: May want to add more variables. Needs graphs to be considered complete. You should discuss what we did on the field trip more. You should go more into depth and explain more the evaluation and conclusion. Also, what you wrote for your procedure would be better placed as the paragraph explaining the method for your original research question, while the procedure is what we actually did on the field trip. All you have to do is copy and paste the procedure that was said in the Science on Seneca Manual and put it in the procedure section. For the graph, instead of using b to represent the PM group, you may want to change the b to p just to make it a bit easier to understand for people who have no clue what you're talking about. Moral of the story, you should focus more on what we did and collected on the field trip rather than your research question.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I said I had a tough time entering the graphs so if thats all that was wrong with it, I'm in good shape

    ReplyDelete